The independent platform for news, articles and advice for professionals in laboratory medicine

Method comparison studies in biomedical science: an introduction

Following series on measurement uncertainty and internal quality control, Stephen MacDonald now turns his attention to method comparison, and here provides an introduction to what will be covered in the series in subsequent issues of the magazine.

All analytical tests we perform are expected to be sufficiently reliable and accurate so that any clinical decision based on results can be taken with confidence. For a test to achieve this it is then labelled as fit for purpose. No matter which discipline we work in, most of the ‘things’ we are trying to measure are well out of our reach to measure directly. As much as measuring tree rings is used as a surrogate for past temperatures, we are limited to indirect measurements of physiological processes. Right from the start we realise that what we measure may be far removed from actually what we want to know.

This may cause issues when we want to add an assay to our repertoire, or update an existing one. We are limited to what we are able to compare it against. Comparability is the fact or quality of being similar and able to be compared. If it exists, we compare ourselves to another, equally indirect, measure of the thing we want to know. If one does not exist, we need a way of being sure the method works. Review of the literature in the field suggests this is a process that is poorly done. At its simplest, we need to know whether multiple methods of measuring the same thing do so in a way that we can call equivalent. We will try to address that in the coming series of articles.

Recently, we have been required to implement new assays to help with the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 disease, from serology testing for antibodies to detecting the presence of viral RNA. How do we compare new methods to what we have… or even do not have? We compare ourselves to gold standards when available. Does the new method provide the same (or acceptably similar) results on the same samples?

Log in or register FREE to read the rest

This story is Premium Content and is only available to registered users. Please log in at the top of the page to view the full text. If you don't already have an account, please register with us completely free of charge.
Register

Upcoming Events

Pathology Horizons 2024

MacDonald Bath Spa Hotel, Bath
18-20 April, 2024

Diagnostics North East Conference 2024

The Catalyst, Newcastle upon Tyne
19 April, 2024

ECCMID 2024 - European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases

Fira Gran Via, 08038 Barcelona, Spain
27-30 April 2024

British Society for Microbial Technology Annual Microbiology Conference

UK Health Security Agency, Colindale, London
2 May 2024

EQA Reports: Interpreting Key Information & Troubleshooting Tips

ONLINE - Zoom
Thursday 16th May 2024

Participants’ Meeting: UK NEQAS Immunology, Immunochemistry & Allergy

Sheffield Hallam University, City Campus, Howard Street, Sheffield
24th May 2024

Access the latest issue of Pathology In Practice on your mobile device together with an archive of back issues.

Download the FREE Pathology In Practice app from your device's App store

Upcoming Events

Pathology Horizons 2024

MacDonald Bath Spa Hotel, Bath
18-20 April, 2024

Diagnostics North East Conference 2024

The Catalyst, Newcastle upon Tyne
19 April, 2024

ECCMID 2024 - European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases

Fira Gran Via, 08038 Barcelona, Spain
27-30 April 2024

British Society for Microbial Technology Annual Microbiology Conference

UK Health Security Agency, Colindale, London
2 May 2024

EQA Reports: Interpreting Key Information & Troubleshooting Tips

ONLINE - Zoom
Thursday 16th May 2024

Participants’ Meeting: UK NEQAS Immunology, Immunochemistry & Allergy

Sheffield Hallam University, City Campus, Howard Street, Sheffield
24th May 2024

Access the latest issue of Pathology In Practice on your mobile device together with an archive of back issues.

Download the FREE Pathology In Practice app from your device's App store

Step Communications Ltd, Step House, North Farm Road, Tunbridge Wells, Kent TN2 3DR
Tel: 01892 779999
www.step-communications.com
© 2024 Step Communications Ltd. Registered in England. Registration Number 3893025